Showing posts with label virtual audrey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label virtual audrey. Show all posts

Monday, October 14, 2013

"The Face of Garbo" -- Roland Barthes, Mythologies (w/ illustrations)

Greta Garbo from Inspiration (1931)


Garbo still belongs to that moment in cinema when capturing the human face still plunged audiences into the deepest ecstasy, when one literally lost oneself in a human image as one would in a philtre, when the face represented a kind of absolute state of the flesh, which could be neither reacher nor renounced.  A few years earlier the face of Valentino was causing suicides; that of Garbo still partakes of the same rule of Courtly Love, where the flesh gives rise to mystical feelings of perdition.

It is indeed an admirable face-object.  In Queen Christina, a film which has again been shown in Paris in the last few years, the make-up has the snowy thickness of a mask:  it is not a painted face, but one set in plaster, protected by the surface of the colour, not by its lineaments.  Amid all this snow at once fragile and compact, the eyes alone, black like strange soft flesh, but not in the least expressive, are two faintly tremulous wounds.  In spite of its extreme beauty, this face, not drawn but sculpted in something smooth and friable, that is, at once perfect and ephemeral, comes to resemble the flour-white complexion of Charlie Chaplin, the dark vegetation of his eyes, his totem-like countenance.


left: Charlie Chaplin as 'The Tramp'
right: Chaplin without any mask or makeup)
(images via wikipedia.org)


Now the temptation of the absolute mask (the mask of antiquity, for instance) perhaps implies less the theme of the secret (as is the case with the Italian half mask) than that of an archetype of the human face.  Garbo offered to one's gaze a sort of Platonic Idea of the human creature, which explains why her face is almost sexually undefined, without however leaving one in doubt.  It is true that this film (in which Queen Christina is by turns a woman and a young cavalier) lends itself to this lack of differentiation; but Garbo does not perform in it any feat of transvestism; she is always herself, and carries without pretence, under her crown or her wide-brimmed hats, the same snowy solitary face.  The name given to her, the Divine, probably aimed to convey less a superlative state of beauty than the essence of her corporeal person, descended from a heaven where all things are formed and perfected in the clearest light.  She herself knew this:  how many actresses have consented to let the crowd see the ominous maturing of their beauty.  Not she, however; the essence was not to be degraded, her face was not to have any reality except that of its perfection, which was intellectual even more than forma.  The Essence became gradually obscured, progressively veiled with dark glasses, broad hats and exiles:  but it never deteriorated.


'AAA_Audrey,' 3D Base-Model 
designed on Audrey Hepburn
available from turbosquid.com
artist credit: AAApoly


And yet, in this deified face, something sharper than a mask is looming:  a kind of voluntary and therefore human relation between the curve of the nostrils and the arch of the eyebrows; a rare, individual function relating two regions of the face.  A mask is but a sum of lines; a face, on the contrary, is above all their thematic harmony.  Garbo's face represents this fragile moment when the cinema is about to draw an existential from an essential beauty, when the archetype leans towards fascination of mortal faces, when the clarity of the flesh as essence yields its place to a lyricism of Woman.

Viewed as a transition the face of Garbo reconciles two iconographic ages, it assures the passage form awe to charm.  As is well known, we are today at the other pole of this evolution:  the face of Audrey Hepburn, for instance, is individualized, not only because of its peculiar thematics (woman as child, woman as kitten) but also because of her person, of an almost unique specification of the face, which has nothing of the essence left in it, but is constituted by an infinite complexity of morphological functions.  As a language, Garbo's singularity was of the order of the concept, that of Audrey Hepburn is of the order of the substance.  The face of Garbo is an idea, that of Hepburn, an Event.


-- Roland Barthes, Mythologies



Barthes, Roland.  "The Face of Garbo."  Mythologies.  Trans.  Annette Lavers.  The Noonday Press, New York:  1992.

Statue of Garbo in her hometown
(image via wikipedia.org)



* * *


* * *

Friday, July 5, 2013

J. G. Ballard + Social Media -- the Virtual & the Real

The ever-relevant Ballardian.com has put up a new article, this one about J. G. Ballard predicting Social Media.

Here's a quote / preview:

[Everybody] will be living inside a TV studio.  
That's what the domestic home aspires to these days ... 
We're all going to be starring in our own sit-coms, 
and they'll be very strange sit-coms, too, like the inside of our heads.  
That's going to come, I'm absolutely sure of that, 
and it'll really shake up everything.
-- J.G. Ballard


Read the rest of the article here:


(what better way to talk about the condemnation of social media than on my personal blog?)

Although the article's title makes mention of Reality TV, 
it doesn't talk at much length about the topic, 
but I guess it shares principles with CCTV & Social Media?
Reality TV sort of borrows CCTV's "form" but applies the mechanics of traditional entertainment TV & Social Media.

I'm not the most familiar with J. G. Ballard's work, I've read The Day of Creation and a few of his short stories, but what I have read was intriguing -- and Ballardian.com has a lot of interesting articles and essays applying Ballardianism to our present day and age.


* * *


* * *


Friday, June 7, 2013

Alternate 'A Scanner Darkly' Pitch -- Ghost Cinema -- Animation

(I found this via the Total Dickhead)
    




What a different aesthetic than Linklater's adaptation; I really dig it.
Much more surreal and genre inspired.




A Scanner Darkly (2006)
dir. Richard Linklater

Although I have respect for Linklater,
and I think he did a commendable job with Scanner,
the visual style I always was always unsure about.

Why the choice to rotoscope?
And why rotoscope so closely to the real?

I suppose it gives a slightly "unreal" quality to the image all the way across the board, but, at the same time, I wished it were either more real or more stylized.  That might be strange to say, since A Scanner Darkly is one of those Dick novels which avoids planting both feet on the same plane, but I do feel it's the case.

Animation is quite versatile and expressive because each frame can be produced without regard to limitation, save for the trace of the human eye; to confine it to what a human body is capable of is to work against the craft.  At the same time, we never really get to witness the genuine acting or emotions of the actors on screen... which is also unfortunate, because that's what animation doesn't produce: human faces.

Still, the animation in Linklater's Scanner is not quite trying to be real.
It's uncanny, but also not.
It's life trying to be a drawing, which is stranger than a cartoon trying to be real.

Now I'm just babbling.
I'm glad a film was made; it exposed more people to one of PKD's better stories, and did so in a respectful manner.


~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~EDIT / UPDATE * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~


JUNE 8th, 2013 UPDATE:
I had meant to cross link to my other post about the CGI Audrey Hepburn ad, but forgot.
So here's the link now:

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Digital Audrey Hepburn -- Galaxy Chocolate, "Chauffer" -- Framestore

There's a video which has gone viral recently; it's a commercial starring the late Audrey Hepburn as she enjoys a Galaxy Chocolate bar.

The video's popularity is due to the lifelike quality of the Hepburn character within:  a sort of marvel and mystique surrounds her returned image, sensationalized as though it were a new Audrey film, while simultaneously enjoying our knowledge that it is not Audrey we see, but a creation.

Galaxy  Chocolate's "Chauffeur" 
with Audrey Hepburn (?)*


Framestore, the CG effects company behind the simulated Audrey, culled together a library of Hepburn imagery:  film clips; media bits; photographs; news reels; etc.  Anything which had Audrey in it, they utilized to piece together the animation.

They pinned the pieces onto the best Audrey Hepburn look-alike they could find, although, if what I understand is correct, none of the look-alike was in the final video.  She figured as a sort of skeleton to give the digital Audrey an anchorage in the film.

(read about the process from Framestore)

"The biggest challenges in recreating an authentic and unmistakable Audrey Hepburn TM 
proved to be the eyes and smile [...] originally the team had hoped to use the real eyes and build the CG face around them, as post-production progressed it became clear that recognition was key to the success of this ad and, close though the actress was, full CG was the only way to get it right."


Duplication, simulation, celebrity, commodity...

Post-modern much?



The Digesting Duck of Vaucanson
( via wikipedia )



~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~EDIT / UPDATE * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~



* June 8th, 2013 UPDATE:  Originally, I had embedded the full Galaxy advertisement, however the video I linked to has since been taken down from YouTube.  I've taken down the link and replaced it with a still from the advertisement.

screen grab of the broken link 
as it appeared my blog

Hepburn's estate/children had signed a deal for the use of Audrey's image in the advertisement; part of the deal stated that viewership was to be limited to audiences in the UK....

...An odd agreement to make, considering the ubiquity of the internet.

And, of course, Hepburn is a Hollywood symbol, so this is naturally going to be popular in the USA (i.e. home of Hollywood).

Suffice to say the video went viral, and viral viewership heeds to no 'physical' Geography...
Lots of these links are going down.

* * *
* * *